Does a Modified Technique to Achieve Arthrodesis of the Wrist After Resection of the Distal Radius and Translocating the Ipsilateral Ulna as a Vascularized Graft to Reconstruct the Defect Improve Grip Strength and Outcomes Scores?

BACKGROUND: Ten years ago, we reported the results of a procedure in which we translocated the ipsilateral ulna as a vascularized autograft to reconstruct defects of the distal radius after tumor resection, with excellent functional results. At that time, wrist arthrodesis was achieved by aligning the translocated ulna with the scapholunate area of the carpus and usually the third metacarpal. This resulted in wrist narrowing. We then wondered if aligning the translocated ulna with the scaphoid and the second metacarpal would result in ulnar deviation and thereby improve grip strength. We believed lateralization would reduce the wrist narrowing that occurs with fusion to the third metacarpal and would make the cosmesis more acceptable. We also modified the incision to dororadial to make the scar less visible and thus improve the cosmesis. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there an objective improvement in grip strength and functional scores (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society [MSTS] and Mayo wrist) when the translocated ulna is lateralized and the wrist is fused with the translocated ulna and aligned with the second metacarpal versus when the translocated ulna is aligned with the third metacarpal? (2) Did lateralization caused by the wrist fusion aligned with the second metacarpal minimize wrist narrowing as measured by the circumference compared with the fusion aligned with the third metacarpal? METHODS: From 2010 and 2018, we treated 40 patients with distal radius tumors at our institution, 30 of whom had a distal radius enbloc resection. Twenty-eight patients had an ipsilateral ulna translocation and wrist arthrodesis in which the radius and translocated ulna were aligned with either the second (n = 15) or the third (n = 13) metacarpals. Two patients in the second metacarpal group and three patients in the third metacarpal group were lost to follow-up before 24 months after surgery and were excluded. A retrospective analysis of 23 patients (20 with giant cell tumors and three with malignant bone tumors) included a review of radiographs and institutional tumor database for surgical and follow-up records to study oncologic (local disease recurrence), reconstruction (union of osteotomy junctions, implant breakage or graft fracture, and wrist circumference), and functional outcomes (MSTS and Mayo wrist scores and objective grip strength assessment compared with the contralateral side). The results were compared for each study group (second metacarpal versus third metacarpal). There was no difference in the incidence of local recurrence or the time to union between the two groups. There were no implant breakages or graft fractures noted in either group. RESULTS: Patients in the second metacarpal group lost less grip strength compared with the unoperated side in the third metacarpal group (median 12% [range -30% to 35%] versus median 28% [15% to 42%], difference of medians 16%; p = 0.006). There were no between-group differences in terms of MSTS (median 30 [24 to 30] versus median 26.5 [22 to 30], difference of medians 3.5; p = 0.21) or Mayo wrist scores (median 83 [65 to 100] versus median 72 [50 to 90], difference of medians 11; p = 0.10). The second metacarpal group also had less wrist narrowing as seen from the median difference in circumference between the operated and unoperated wrists (median narrowing 10 mm [3 to 35 mm] in the second metacarpal group versus median 30 mm [15 to 35 mm] in the third metacarpal group, difference of medians 20 mm; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Wrist arthrodesis after ulna translocation with alignment of the translocated ulna and the second metacarpal provides a functional position with ulnar deviation that offers some improvement in grip strength but no improvement in the MSTS or Mayo scores. Radialization/lateralization of the translocated ulna achieved from the alignment with the second metacarpal decreases the reduction in the wrist circumference and therefore reduces wrist narrowing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Revision Elbow Arthroplasty Using a Proximal Ulnar Allograft with Allograft Triceps for Combined Ulnar Bone Loss and Triceps Insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: When revision elbow arthroplasty is required in the presence of structural proximal ulnar bone loss and triceps insufficiency, structural ulnar bone-grafting and triceps reconstruction are both required to reconstruct the skeleton and to restore active extension. We have developed a technique utilizing a structural proximal ulnar allograft with its attached triceps as an allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) to provide reconstruction of the proximal ulnar bone and deficient extensor mechanism with the same allograft. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2017, the senior author performed 10 revision elbow arthroplasties using a proximal ulnar allograft with its intact triceps tendon allograft. The allograft ulna was combined with an ulnar component in an APC fashion, whereas the remaining triceps was repaired to the triceps allograft. Indications for a revision surgical procedure included aseptic loosening in 4 elbows, periprosthetic ulnar fracture with component loosening in 2 elbows, and the second stage of a 2-stage reimplantation in 4 elbows. Two elbows also required humeral APCs due to associated structural humeral bone loss. Postoperatively, all elbows were immobilized in extension for 6 weeks. The mean follow-up time was 45 months (range, 24 to 76 months). RESULTS: Revision elbow arthroplasty resulted in pain improvement in all elbows in a 10-point visual analog scale. The mean flexion-extension arc was 95°, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 76 points (range, 45 to 95 points), and the mean triceps strength score was 4. There were 6 reoperations: 3 for humeral loosening, 1 for deep infection, 1 for fracture of the ulnar allograft, and 1 for wound debridement and closure. For the 8 elbows with an intact ulnar reconstruction, no ulnar components were radiographically loose, and the ulnar graft was considered radiographically intact and healed in 8 elbows. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of the proximal part of the ulna and triceps in failed elbow arthroplasties with structural ulnar bone loss can be effectively accomplished using a structural proximal ulnar allograft as an APC with the preserved triceps tendon for the extensor mechanism reconstruction, but the procedure is associated with an expected high reoperation rate, as is the case in complex revision elbow arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Volar Radius Vascularized Bone Flaps for the Treatment of Scaphoid Nonunion.

Vascularized bone flaps (VBFs) improve union rates for scaphoid nonunions compared with nonvascularized grafts. Volar VBFs are indicated in cases of scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis and/or humpback deformity. Four volar VBFs are described in this article. The volar carpal artery and pronator quadratus VBFs are most commonly used. The pisiform VBF can be used for replacement of the proximal pole of the scaphoid; it is covered by articular cartilage. The ulna VBF has greater donor morbidity; the ulnar artery is harvested and a palpable donor site deformity results.

Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Atrophy Reconstructed With Autogenous Bone Graft Harvested From the Proximal Ulna.

Atrophy of the alveolar ridge requires bone grafting at the implant site for rehabilitation of the masticatory function with dental implants. Despite the advances in the development of bone substitutes, autogenous bone graft remains the "criterion standard" because of its osteogenic, osteoinductive, osteoconductive potential, and non-immunogenic properties. However, harvesting of autogenous bone is not exempt from donor site morbidity. In this context, the use of autogenous bone derived from the proximal ulna might be a viable resource to obtain corticocancellous bone graft, as the harvesting from this donor site is associated with low morbidity. Thus, this article aimed to describe a case in which a maxillary sinus floor augmentation was performed by means of autogenous bone graft harvested from the proximal ulna, as the donor site. An appositional bone block graft harvested from the same region was used to augment the residual alveolar ridge. Clinically, healing proceeded uneventfully with no major complications. After 8 months, a proper amount of bone was found at the implant site, allowing a prosthetically driven implant insertion and subsequent implant-supported rehabilitation. Results were clinically and radiographically stable after a 3-year follow-up. The present case report suggested that proximal ulna as a donor site should be considered as a safe and reliable alternative for alveolar ridge augmentation. Besides the case presentation, a comprehensive review of the literature was also provided.

Vascularized ulnar periosteal pedicled flap for forearm reconstruction: Anatomical study and a case report.

PURPOSE: Through an anatomical review, the aim of this study is to define the ulnar periosteal branches of the posterior interosseous vessels (PIV). In addition, we report the clinical utility of a vascularized ulnar periosteal pedicled flap (VUPPF), supplied by the investigated PIV, in a complex case of radial nonunion. METHODS: Ten upper limbs latex colored from fresh human cadavers were used. Branches of the PIV were dissected under 2.5× loupe magnification, noting the periosteal, muscular, and cutaneous branches arising distal to the interosseous recurrent artery. The VUPPF was measured in length (cm) and width (cm). RESULTS: The PIV provided a mean 12.8 periosteal branches to the ulna distributed along the most distal 15 cm, with a mean distance between branches of 1 cm, allowing for the design of a VUPPF which measured a mean 12 cm in length and 1.7 cm in width. We used a VUPPF of 7.8 cm in length and 2 cm in width to treat extensive nonvascularized bone graft nonunion with a defect of 2 cm of the left radius in a 6-year-old girl, secondary to previous Ewing's Sarcoma reconstruction. Successfully consolidation was achieved 6-months after surgery. The patient did not present postoperative complications. At 2-years of follow-up after surgery, active supination was 80° and pronation 0° (due an incomplete interosseous ossification); grip strength was 80% that of the opposite hand. The patient had resumed all her daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: VUPPF may be considered a valuable and reliable surgical option for forearm reconstruction in complex clinical scenarios.

Forearm as a valuable source of vascularized bone graft for the distal humerus.

BACKGROUND: The nonunion of a distal humeral fracture is a challenging complication. Our aim was to assess the results of the application of pedicled bone flap to treat this problem. METHODS: There were 6 men and 3 women with delayed union or nonunion of the distal humerus treated by 10 procedures of rigid fixation plus radial bone forearm or posterior interosseous bone flaps. A locking plate was applied for fixation in 4 patients and a pin and plate for 5 patients. The olecranon osteotomy was performed in 6 elbows. RESULTS: Patients were a mean age of 49.2 years (range, 31-70 years). The average interval between the trauma and the index operation was 19.2 months (range, 3-49 months). Eight elbows showed union within an average of 3.75 months (range, 3-6 months) in the column where the bony flap was placed. The radial forearm bone flap failed to unite the nonunion of the lateral column of 1 elbow, and additional tension banding was required. Two elbows did not heal at the medial column when the radial forearm bone flap was located on the lateral column. For 1 elbow, another posterior interosseous bone flap was applied on the medial side in another session. By a mean follow-up of 37.3 months (range, 24-79 months), the mean of the visual analog scale demonstrated significant improvement from 6.44 postoperatively to 2.22 (P < .001). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score and 11-Item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score also showed clinically and statistically significant improvements. CONCLUSION: Vascularized bone flaps could be considered as an option to facilitate healing of distal humerus delayed union or nonunion.

Functional outcome of en bloc resection of a giant cell tumour of the distal radius and arthrodesis of the wrist and distal ulna using an ipsilateral double barrel segmental ulna bone graft combined with a modified Sauve-Kapandji procedure.

Giant cell tumour of the distal radius is a locally aggressive lesion. In this study, we performed a wrist arthrodesis reconstruction with an ipsilateral double barrel segmental ulnar bone graft combined with a modified Sauve-Kapandji procedure for a giant cell tumour of the distal radius. From January 2007 to September 2013, we followed eight patients for a mean duration of 36 months. One patient developed a recurrence and was treated by amputation; the other seven patients achieved radiological union in about 8 months. There was no wrist instability, deformation or dislocation; the mean range of motion of the forearm achieved 75° of supination and 70° of pronation. The patients could recover reasonable grip strength. This new operative procedure can excise the tumour with a low rate of recurrence, fewer functional deficits and fewer complications than reported for other procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic.

Treatment of Infected Forearm Nonunions With Large Complete Segmental Defects Using Bulk Allograft and Intramedullary Fixation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the results of a series of infected forearm nonunions treated from 1998 to 2012 using a staged reconstruction technique. METHODS: At a median of 42 months follow-up, 7 patients who had an average segmental defect of 4.9 cm (range, 2.3-10.4 cm) were available for clinical and radiographic evaluation. Treatment consisted of serial debridement, implantation of an antibiotic cement spacer, and staged reconstruction using a bulk radius or ulna allograft with intramedullary fixation. RESULTS: All 7 patients ultimately achieved solid bone union, although 4 patients (57%) required additional surgery, consisting of autologous bone grafting and plating, to achieve healing at 1 of the allograft-host junction sites. No patient had recurrence of infection, and all reported substantial improvement with increased function and decreased pain. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach ultimately resulted in a 100% union rate without recurrence of infection, although many patients may require additional surgery to attain healing at both allograft-junction sites. Using bulk allograft provides the ability to span a large defect while reconstituting the forearm anatomy. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

A Comparison of the Effect Between Coronoid Process Graft and Costochondral Graft in the Reconstruction of Temporomandibular Joint.

PURPOSE: Bone graft to reconstruct the temporomandibular joint for ankylosis patient is effective. This study used three-dimensional measurement to evaluate the effect between free coronoid process graft (CPG) and costochondral graft (CCG) in the temporomandibular joint reconstruction. METHODS: Patients treated with CPG or CCG from 2011 to 2014 were included in the study. Postoperative computed tomography scan data within 1 week and during at least 6 months follow-up after operation were imported into Proplan CMF 1.4 software (Materialize, Belgium) for three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement. Heights of the mandibular ramus were measured and compared between the 2 groups. Maximum mouth opening and occlusion were also evaluated and compared before and after operation. RESULTS: Ten patients with 15 reconstructed joints were included in the study. In the CPG group, the decrease of ramus height was 5.4 mm after a mean follow-up period of 16.8 months (ranged from 6 to 22 months), whereas in the CCG group, it was 2.4 mm after a mean follow-up period of 14.4 months (ranged from 6 to 30 months). There was significant difference of ramus height decrease between the CPG group and the CCG group (P < 0.05). Maximum mouth opening was significantly increased after operation than before in both groups (P < 0.05). Open bite happened in 4 of 5 patients in the CPG group, and 1 of 5 patients in the CCG group. CONCLUSIONS: CPG has higher frequency of a malocclusion secondary to resorption than CCG for the ramus reconstruction.

The Folded Ulnar Forearm Flap for Nasal Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Many strategies exist to reconstruct composite nasal defects, but free flaps are necessary for extensive defects. The workhorse radial forearm flap is hair-bearing and donor-site cosmesis is unfavorable. The ulnar forearm flap is overlooked despite important aesthetic benefits. The authors describe their experience with the ulnar forearm flap, with a novel folding technique in staged nasal reconstruction. METHODS: Between December of 2010 and April of 2015, 10 nasal reconstructions in five men and five women were performed. Average patient age was 47.6 years (range, 31 to 76 years). The ulnar forearm flap was designed as a narrow contiguous flap along the ulnar vascular axis. Inset began with the nasal floor; the flap was then tubularized twice to create nasal passages before it was folded on itself for coverage. Caudal edges were sewn together to create alae and a columella. Follow-up time, complications, number of operations, and reconstructive duration were documented. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 25.2 months (range, 18 to 44 months). Patients had satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes after 6.4 operations (range, five to eight) over 11.1 months (range, 8 to 18 months). Partial necrosis of the alar lining in one case was salvaged with the covering flap. Two cases of chondritis were managed with conservative débridement and antibiotics. One case of severe chondritis necessitated removal and de novo reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The ulnar forearm flap is safe and reliable in nasal reconstruction, with superior donor-site cosmesis. The tubular folding method creates a vascular envelope amenable to same-stage framework construction. With thoughtful planning and sufficient refinement, excellent aesthetic and functional results are achievable. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Vascularized posterior interosseous pedicled bone grafting for infected forearm nonunion.

Infected forearm nonunion is challenging to treat. We have used a vascularized pedicled bone graft from the distal ulna based on the posterior interosseous artery to treat forearm nonunion with current or previous signs of infection in six patients. Bone union was achieved after a mean of 3.8 months. After a mean follow-up of 25.7 months, no signs of persistent or reactivation of infection were seen in any patient. The mean Quick DASH score significantly improved from 77.4 to 17.6. In addition, the active range of motion of the wrist improved significantly after surgery. In our patients, a vascularized posterior interosseous pedicled bone from the distal ulna is a reliable vascularized bone graft for managing infected forearm nonunion.

Ulnar forearm osteocutaneous flap harvesting using Kapandji procedure for pre-existing complicated fibular flap on mandible reconstruction--cadaveric and clinical study.

UNLABELLED: It is not uncommon that after using a fibular flap for lower gum cancer reconstruction, nonunion, chronic osteomyelitis, or fibular bone exposure occurs, which requires a composite bone and soft tissue reconstruction. Radial forearm osteocutaneous flap possesses the risk of stress fracture. Ulnar forearm osteocutaneous flap can be another option for small bone defect reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Six patients who had undergone fibular flap for mandible reconstructions and sustained either bone exposure (3 patients), chronic osteomyelitis (1 patient), malocclusion (1 patient), or osteoradionecrosis (1 patient) underwent ulnar forearm osteocutaneous flap with 3-cm ulnar bone for touch-up procedure. The distal radioulnar joints were fused with a screw. Six ulnar forearm osteocutaneous flap dissections were also performed on 4 fresh frozen cadavers to clarify the anatomic distribution of the distal ulnar artery. RESULT: All 6 ulnar forearm osteocutaneous flaps survived with one re-exploration for venous occlusion. All presented bone union. Comparable to the clinical dissection, the cadaveric distal ulnar artery demonstrates a periosteal branch that runs between the proper ulnar nerve and dorsal sensory nerve. This periosteal branch comes out of an ulnar artery approximately 3 cm proximal to the wrist joint. CONCLUSION: Ulnar forearm osteocutaneous flap can provide a secondary flap of wide skin paddle and small segment bone for specific mandibular defect after a fibular flap transfer.

Healing masseter entheses of mandibular reconstruction with autograft--Raman spectroscopic and histological study.

Autogenous bone graft represents the gold standard for mandibular reconstruction. The authors used a beagle mandibular defect model and reconstructed with iliac crest and ulna graft. Healing masseter entheses were harvested 24 weeks after surgery and analyzed by histology and Raman microspectroscopy. The intensity ratio of 960/2940 was to document mineral-to-collagen ratio as degree of mineralization. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the association between the intensity ratios of 960/2940 and the tendon-to-bone insertion site. In the normal control group (n=4) and the experimental control group with detached masseter muscle (n=4), the degree of mineralization at the insertion site increased linearly from tendon to bone. In the iliac graft (n=4) and ulna graft groups (n=4), healing entheses were far less mature than controls and a linear trend was not observed. There was no significant correlation between degree of mineralization and insertion site in the ulna group (r(spearman)=0.519, P>0.001). These results indicate that transplanted bone plays a critical role in healing of entheses and healing enthesis to reconstructed mandible is inferior to normal. Raman spectroscopy provides quantitative information about different healing entheses and gives valuable insight into mechanical properties of entheses in functional mandibular reconstruction.

Intercalated bone PEG in the treatment of non-united scaphoid fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Untreated ununited scaphoid fractures will almost inevitably progress to radiographic and symptomatic osteoarthritis of the wrist. This may lead to subsequent morbidity and lifelong disability especially in young males in which the fracture scaphoid is more common. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients presenting non-united fracture scaphoid were operated upon by using disto-proximal bone peg technique with average time between injury and operation as 11 months (6-18 months). All of them male with average age of 26 years (17-35 years). There were 17 patients with fracture waist (80.9%) and four patients with fracture proximal pole (19.1%). RESULTS: Anatomy of the wrist was restored and radiological healing confirmed in 17/21, partial healing in 3/21 and non-union in 3/21 patients. Eighteen patients (85.7%) were graded as satisfactory, 5 patients (23.8%) were graded as excellent, ten patients (47.6%) were graded as good, and three patients (14.3%) were graded as fair. The remaining three patients (14.3%) were graded as unsatisfactory. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the disto-proximal bone peg technique of taking the graft from the ipsilateral ulna without using any metal work for fixing scaphoid non-union fracture is a reliable, easy, and inexpensive alternative method. However, we would not recommend it for the non-union of the scaphoid proximal pole fracture. Also we find the time lag before operation is one of the most important factors to achieve union in non-united fractures of the scaphoid. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic case series, level 1V.

[Animal experimentation of reimplantation of hypertonic saline-induced devitalized bone].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the healing process and the change of biomechanical properties of hypertonic saline-induced devitalized bone segment, so as to provide fundamental theory for clinical treatment. METHODS: A model of New Zealand rabbit ulnar segments devitalized by hypertonic saline was established and then reimplanted in situ. The ulnar specimens were taken for examination of X-rays, light microscope and three-point-bend test at the end of 3, 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: The devitalized bone healed at the end of 12 weeks in the X-ray film. The histological examination showed that osteoblast multiplied and secreted osteoid gradually. The maximal breaking load of the devitalized bone continuously increased and reached the top at the end of 24 weeks [control group (206.25±16.64) N vs. devitalized group (196.88±8.24) N, P>0.05]. CONCLUSION: The devitalized bone healed through intramembranous and endochondral ossification, and the endochondral ossification predominated; the biomechanical strength of devitalized bone continually increased as time lasted.

Forearm reconstruction with bone allograft following tumor excision: a series of 10 patients with a mean follow-up of 10 years.

BACKGROUND: After a tumor resection, the reestablishment of the bone continuity at the forearm remains a challenge for restoring the biomechanics of hand and elbow. Bone allograft might be one option to consider amongst other suitable alternatives but there are insufficient data available to substantiate its value. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated a series of 10 consecutive patients that had presented a bone tumor at the forearm. After bone excision, the segmental loss was replaced either by a bone allograft or an osteochondral allograft. Patients were reviewed clinically and with radiographs. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 110 ± 99 months. Fracture of the allograft was the most prevalent complication occurring in four patients, mainly in the osteoarticular group. Four patients were surgically revised: two of them had a fracture of the allograft that required a new one, another one had a painful stiff wrist requiring removal of the allograft and arthrodesis with autograft and the fourth one had a non-union of an intercalary allograft that was treated by a distal ulnar joint resection. Intercalary allograft had fewer complications than osteoarticular allografts and they had a better functional MSTS score with an average of 79% of a normal function compared to osteoarticular allografts with an average score of 62%. There was no infection. At the latest follow-up, one reconstruction of the forearm with an allograft failed and concerned the distal radius joint. DISCUSSION: A bone allograft when available can be considered as one amongst other suitable options for the reconstruction of the forearm skeleton.

Vascularized ulnar bone grafts for limb-sparing surgery for the treatment of distal radial osteosarcoma.

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare vascularized free or roll-in ulnar bone grafts for limb-sparing surgery in dogs with radial osteosarcoma with the cortical allograft, metal endoprosthesis, or distraction osteogenesis techniques. Overall, the ulnar graft techniques used in this study demonstrated excellent healing properties. Complications included recurrence of the tumor in 25% (2/8) of the dogs, metastasis in 50% (4/8) of the dogs, implant loosening in 37.5% (3/8) of the dogs, implant failure in 12.5% (1/8) of the dogs, and infection in 62.5% (5/8) of the dogs. Mean survival time was 29.3 mo (range, 9 to 61 mo). The mean metastasis-free interval was 33.67 mo (range, 8 to 54 mo). Tumors recurred locally in two dogs at 10 mo and 20 mo postoperatively. This study yielded similar long-term complications as other limb-sparing options (such as cortical allografts and metal endoprostheses) and allowed dogs to bear weight on the operated limb with acceptable limb function. More research is needed regarding specific healing times for ulnar vascularized grafts, time until implant removal, and the extent of radial bone that could ultimately be replaced by the ulna.

[Pedicled bone transfers for digit reconstruction]. / Transferts osseux vascularisés pédiculés et reconstruction digitale.

The techniques of pedicled bone transfer harvested from the forearm and the hand are largely used in digit reconstruction during the last three decades. Comparing with the vascularized bone-free transfer techniques, their realization is generally easier because of the single operative field and the absence of microvascular suture. Based on their clinical experience, the authors try to make the point about the surgical techniques and the indications of the principal pedicled bone transfers harvested from the forearm and the hand for digit reconstruction.

[Radiocarpal reconstruction by island transfer of the distal radio-ulnar joint]. / Reconstruction radiocarpienne par transfert en îlot de l'articulation radio-ulnaire distale.

INTRODUCTION: We described the island transfer of the DRUJ to reconstruct the radiocarpal joint when the radiocarpal and the mediocarpal joints are destroyed. The objective is to avoid wrist arthrodesis or prosthesis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From 1993 to 1997, five patients were operated, five men, the average age was 55 years (36 to 67). The operated side was the dominant side one time. The joint destruction was secondary to: SLAC wrist (stage 3) in two cases, a failure of PRC in two cases and post-traumatic necrosis of the lunatum in one case. RESULTS: One failure was resumed by total wrist arthrodesis at 1-year follow-up. Four patients were revised with 11 years follow-up (from nine to 13). Two patients presented a pain-free wrist, two patients complain of barometric pain or after heavy works. The average mobility was: extension 40°, flexion 25°, ulnar deviation 30°, radial deviation -3°, complete pronosupination. The strength was 65% of the opposite side. X-rays showed an important radiocarpal reshaping and ulnar sliding of the carpus. DISCUSSION: The island transfer of the DRUJ was possible in every case. The discordance between clinical and radiological results can be explained by joint denervation. We stopped this procedure not to sacrifice any more the healthy DRUJ. CONCLUSION: The island transfer of the DRUJ to reconstruct the radiocarpal joint is a solution to avoid total wrist arthrodesis or prosthesis if we accept the DRUJ sacrifice.

[Simple and composite ulnar island bone transfers in hand reconstructive surgery]. / Les transferts cubitaux osseux simples et composites en chirurgie reconstructrice de la main.

Over several years, the author has devised different techniques for difficult bony reconstruction in hand surgery. It is based on compound island transfers of ulnar origin, harvested from the forearm's lower third with reverses flow vascularization. Because of the variety of arterial ramifications, these transplants can consist, either of a simple bone ulnar fragment or when associated, of compound cutaneous-osseous, or even cutaneous-tendineous-osseous transplants. These transplants based on a clinical experience of 49 cases can be used by retrograde rotation for a variety of indications such a recalcitrant nonunion of the scaphoid bone, Kienböck disease, osteochondroma with fracture, or severe post-traumatic sequellae. These procedures performed in one operating time permit reconstruction by using vascularized bone and offer large potential solutions improving bone healing.